The University Academics Admission & Aid Athletics Campus Life Events Library

The Death Penalty : An Historical And Theological Survey

  • The Death Penalty : An Historical And Theological Survey
  • Attribution

    by James J. Megivern
  • Publication Details

    Book, Paulist Press, 1997
  • Availability

    LOCATIONCALL #STATUS
     (LOWER LEVEL)  K5104 .M44 1997  AVAILABLE

    New Feature: Text this to your cellphone
    View record in LOLA catalog

  • Description

    Using a chronological and historical approach, he explores the development of the death penalty through early, medieval and modern periods, following elements of its history throughout Europe. Megivern explores the U.S. Catholic Bishops’ rejection of the death penalty, which coincides with its escalation in favor in U.S. public opinion polls. (automatically summarized from Amazon.com)
  • Author

  • Subject

  • Notes

    • This original, timely and definitive study will be an important resource for both scholars and the general public. The Death Penalty includes more information on the history of thinking about capital punishment than is available in any other English work
  • Contents

    • 1. The Death Penalty and Early Christianity
    • 2. Movement in the Medieval Church
    • 3. The Waldensian No and the Thomistic Yes
    • 4. Renaissance and Reformation Dilemmas - - 5. Post-Tridentine Troubles and Tribulations
    • 6. Enlightenment: Religious and Secular
    • 7. From Vatican I to Vatican II
    • 8. The American Context
    • 9. The U.S. Catholic Bishops’ Turnaround
    • 10. Consolidating Consistency (1984-1990)
    • 11. New Setbacks and Advances (1991-1996)
    • 12. Instead of a Conclusion
  • ISBN

    • 0809104873
  • LCCN

  • Open Library ID

Related items

Post a Comment or Send a Message

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please make my comment private!

Please note: Lamson Library serves the Plymouth State University community. We do not sell the books in our collection.

Comments should show a courteous regard for the presence of other voices in the discussion. We reserve the right to edit or delete comments that do not adhere to this standard.